What do you think of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepping down fro...

"[chain of thought] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

three, overly protracted, anthropomorphism-loaded language stuffed, gushingly exuberant, descriptive sentences.

“RAPID ADVANCES IN AI”

Fifth down (on Full Hit)

Further exponential advancement,

the description,

Function Described. January, 2022

and

“anthropomorphically loaded language”?

September, 2024 (OpenAI o1 Hype Pitch)

In two and a half years,

Combining,

putting terms one way,

of the same function,

“Rapidly Evolving Advances in AI”

"a simple method called chain of thought prompting -- a series of intermediate reasoning steps -- improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks.”

January, 2022 (Google)

- further advancing the rapidly advancing … something.

“[chain of thought is] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

“[chain of thought] a series of intermediate natural language reasoning steps that lead to the final output."

The dilemma:

Nails

Of course that was how the

in the 2015 explanatory flowchart -

“Rapidly Advancing AI,”

prompted with those terms and correlations),

better-accepted choice of terminology,

"[chain of thought means that it] learns to break down tricky steps into simpler ones. It learns to try a different approach when the current one isn't working. This process dramatically improves the model's ability to reason."

It’s the same f*cking thing.

What do you think of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman stepping down from the committee responsible for reviewing the safety of models such as o1?

Read also: